Juridical Analysis of the Crime of Beating Resulting in Death by a Minor Perpetrator: Study of Decision No.1/ Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN Mme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v14i3.1380Keywords:
Assault, Child of the perpetrator, Criminal offense, Decision No. 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/Pn MmeAbstract
Children, as individuals in their developmental stages, have the right to legal protection, including when facing the criminal justice system. However, the involvement of children as perpetrators of criminal acts raises specific issues, as seen in Decision No. 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN Mme related to a case of assault that resulted in death. This research focuses on the judge's considerations in imposing sentences and the extent to which the principle of restorative justice is applied in accordance with the Child Criminal Justice System Law. In this study, the method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach, and conceptual approach. This study analyzes Decision No. 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN Mme by examining relevant positive norms and data obtained through library research, which is analyzed qualitatively. The research results show that the judge placed more emphasis on proving the elements of the crime according to Article 170 paragraph (2) sub-paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code without optimizing the restorative justice approach. Although age and reconciliation factors are considered, the diversion process is not implemented thoroughly, resulting in juvenile sentencing not reflecting the restorative principles mandated by the SPPA Law. Law enforcement needs to strengthen the rehabilitative approach by optimally utilizing litmas and psychosocial analysis, as well as prioritizing non-custodial sanctions. The implementation of restorative justice must be internalized through diversion and penal mediation with the support of cross-institutional collaboration and adequate legal infrastructure
Downloads
References
(KPAI), K. P. A. I. (2025). Data Perlindungan Anak Tahun 2024.
Anom, S. (2025). Peran Hakim dalam Mewujudkan Due Process of Law Pada Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 5.
Aquinaldo, A. (2024). Ibu Kandung Noven Witak Histeris di PN Maumere, Hakim Putuskan 6 Tahun Penjara 3 Tersangka Anak. Tribunnews Flores.
Ayu Ratih Indra Kusumawati, Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pengeroyokan oleh Anak di Bawah Umur Mengakibatkan Kematian. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 3(1), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4744.199-203
Capera, B. (2021). Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Paradigma Pemidanaan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6(2), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss2.art1
Dwi Fransiska, M., Ramadani, A. I., Rato, D., & Setyawan, F. (2024). Peran Psikologi Hukum dalam Permasalahan Anak Berhadapan dengan Hukum. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(3), 1368–1375. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i3.6515
Filonia, fredella B. (2024). Penerapan Restorative Justice terhadap Anak dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Hukum in Concreto, 98113.
Hardi Done, Samaluddin, A. W. (2024). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG PROSES PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA OLEH ANAK MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK (Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Psw). Ilmu Hukum Kanturuna Wodo, 5(2), 59–73.
Irawati, E. (2021). PENINGKATAN KAPASITAS DESA BERDASARKAN PADA UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 6 TAHUN 2014 (Sebuah kajian tentang Otonomi Desa). Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(1), 1–13.
Iskandar, I., Abdullah, F., Amri, U., & Astuti, B. (2024). Sistem Pemidanaan Anak yang Berkonflik denganHukum: Ditinjau dari Tujuan Pemidanaan. Nationally Accredited Journal, 8(2), 2540–9166.
Istiqomah, A., Budyatmojo, W., & Setiyanto, B. (2022). Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindakan Kekerasan Terhadap Orang Atau Barang Yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama. Recidive?: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 11(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v11i2.67444
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
Mauladi. (2020). Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik, dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Mubarok, N. (2022). SISTEM PERADILAN ANAK (1st ed.). Insight Mediatama.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.
Muhammad Iqbal, R. M. (2022). Evaluasi Penerapan Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi, 8, 45.
Mulyadi, L. (2014). Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
PA, R. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Nur, M. (2023). Implementasi Diversi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Dalam Tahap Penuntutan Oleh Jaksa Di Wilayah Kejaksaan Negeri Aceh Selatan. Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 11(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v11i1.9945
Putu Kayla Yunita Dewi, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, & I Made Minggu Widyantara. (2022). Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Pengeroyokan yang Menyebabkan Kematian (Putusan Nomor 399/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps). Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3(2), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.55637/jph.3.2.4948.385-390
Rahayuningsih, U., Hikmah, A. N., & Nurcahyati, S. (2025). Pendekatan Restorative Justice dalam Perlindungan Hukum Anak sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana?: Menyeimbangkan Keadilan dan Pembinaan. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik Dan Hukum Indonesia, 2(2), 79–89. https://journal.appihi.or.id/index.php/Amandemen/article/view/883
Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode Penelitian. Cipta Media Nusantara (CMN).
Saragih, Y. M., Hukum, P. I., & Pancabudi, U. P. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3, 6437–6449.
Sudarto. (1990). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Alumni.
Sunanti, E. (2020). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak. Refika Aditama.
Zarzani, T. R., Diriyanti, S., Sukarwoto, & Chair, A. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Fisik di Lingkungan Pendidikan Tinggi ( Menggunakan System Boarding School ). Journal Of Social Science Research, 4, 10134–10147.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 LEGAL BRIEF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
