The Role of Notaries in the Auction Process: A Comparative Analysis be-tween Indonesia and Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v14i5.1479Keywords:
legal effectiveness, comparative law, auctions, notariesAbstract
This study aims to analyse and compare the role of notaries in the auction process between Indonesia and Malaysia using a normative-comparative legal approach. The main issue of this study stems from the differences in institutional structure and legal basis governing the authority of notaries in the auction system in both countries. In Indonesia, the role of notaries is based on Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notaries, the Vendu Reglement (Staatsblad 1908:189), Minister of Finance Regulation No. 213/PMK.06/2020, and Minister of Finance Regulation No. 86/PMK.06/2024 concerning Auction Minutes. In Malaysia, auctions are conducted based on the National Land Code (Revised 2020) and Court Regulations 2012, which are carried out digitally through the e-Lelong system under the supervision of the High Court of Malaya. This study uses a normative-comparative legal approach (doctrinal and comparative legal research) with qualitative-descriptive analysis methods. The data used consists of secondary legal materials in the form of legislation, legal doctrine, and relevant academic literature. The analysis was conducted with reference to the theory of legal effectiveness (Fuller, 1969), the theory of legal certainty (Radbruch, 2006), and the theory of comparative legal functionalism (Zweigert & Kötz, 1998). The results of the study show that the Indonesian legal system is still centred on notaries, emphasising formal legitimacy and the authenticity of deeds, while Malaysia has implemented a judicial auction system model that integrates digitalisation and efficiency of legal processes through e-Lelong. The role of notaries in Indonesia is functional but limited, as the substantive authority to conduct auctions remains in the hands of auction officials, whereas in Malaysia, the function of notaries is almost non-existent as the entire process is under the control of the courts. Theoretically, this study reinforces the view that the effectiveness of the law is not determined solely by legal officials, but rather by the clarity of norms, institutional consistency, and the ability of the system to adapt to legal technology. In practical terms, this study recommends two things: (1) the need to harmonise regulations between the Notary Law and the Minister of Finance Regulation on Auctions to clarify the limits of legal officials' authority, and (2) the acceleration of national auction digitalisation, such as the e-Lelong system in Malaysia. Thus, Indonesia can realise a more efficient and transparent auction system that is in line with the principles of legal certainty, justice, and legal benefits.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, N. (2019). The role of courts in property auction procedures in Malaysia. Malayan Law Journal, 4(1), 55–70.
Al Qindy, F. H. (2021). Inconsistencies in the regulation of notaries' authority to compile auction reports. Notaire, 4(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v4i3.30136
Bahraine, L. U. (2024). Supervisory and supervisory authority of notaries as class II auctioneers based on the Notary Position Act. Officium Notarium, 4(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol4.iss1.art8
Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Christopher, & Lee Ong. (2018). e-Auctions and Construction Dispute Resolution in Court Regulations. Kuala Lumpur: CLO Legal Review.
Dharmanto, H. M., Idham, I., & Fadlan, F. (2021). Juridical analysis of authority of notaries and officials for land deed events after liability rights auction. International Journal of Advanced Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 7(5), 850–856.
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The Morality of Law. Yale University Press.
Gaffar, H. (2024). Implications of digitalisation and AI in the justice system: A glance at the socio-legal angle. International Journal of Law: Law and World, 10(3), 154–177. https://doi.org/10.36475/10.3.14
Government of the Dutch East Indies. (1908). Vendu Reglement (Staatsblad 1908:189). Batavia: Landsdrukkerij.
Government of Malaysia. (2020). National Land Code (Revised 2020). Kuala Lumpur: Law Revision Commissioner.
Malaysian Courts. (2012). Court Rules 2012 (Rule 31A: e-Auction System). Kuala Lumpur: High Court of Malaya .
Malaysian Judiciary. (2023). Guidelines for the e-Auction System. Kuala Lumpur: High Court of Malaya.
Hussain, M., & Hassan, N. (2022). Legal framework of property auction in Malaysian courts. Journal of Malaysian Judiciary, 10(2), 77–94.
Judiciary of Malaysia. (2012). Rules of Court 2012 (Order 31A: e-Lelong System). Kuala Lumpur: High Court of Malaya.
Judiciary of Malaysia. (2023). Official e-Lelong System Guidelines. Kuala Lumpur: High Court of Malaya.
Karunia, A. A., Husni, A., & Sudiarto. (2017). Notary Accountability as a Class II Auctioneer. Jatiswara: Law Journal, 32(3), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v32i3.132
Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Minister of Finance Regulation Number 213/PMK.06/2020 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Auctions. Jakarta: Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia.
Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024). Minister of Finance Regulation No. 86/PMK.06/2024 concerning Auction Minutes. Jakarta: Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia.
Llagami, N. (2024). The use of technology in the justice system. Global Journal of Politics and Law Research, 12(4), 66–82.
Mason, S. (2019). Digital justice reform in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 6(3), 389–407.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Legal Research. Kencana Prenada Media.
Maulida, F. H. (2025). Non-execution auctions by class 2 auction officials (notaries) in PMK No. 122 of 2023. Execution: Journal of Law and State Administration, 3(1), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v3i1.1790
Mildasari, V., & Musyafah, A. A. (2024). The Authority of Notaries as Class II Auctioneers from a Legislative Perspective. Notarius, 17(2), 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i2.53969
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2001). Law and Society in Transition: Towards a Responsive Law. Transaction Publishers.
Pramapta, Y. H. (2023). Interpretation of Article 15 Paragraph (2) Letter g of the Notary Position Law. Officium Notarium, 2(2), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss2.art16
Purnayasa, A. P. (2018). Legal Consequences of the Degradation of Notarial Deeds that do not Meet the Requirements of Authentic Deeds. Acta Comitas: Notarial Law Journal, 3(3), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i03.p01
Radbruch, G. (2006). Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press.
Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 3.
Rusaedi, A. R., Maskanah, U., Herlani, L., & Kusuma, R. N. D. V. (2024). The legality of voluntary non-execution auctions on the internet without auction officials. De Facto Journal, 10(2), 1–16.
Salihah, S., Amelia, A., Amanda, A., & Utami, Y. E. W. (2025). The authority of notaries as class II auctioneers in auction settlements. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(2), 2047–2056. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i2.1206
Sari, E., Yamin, M., Purba, H., & Sembiring, R. (2021). Comparison of land law systems between Indonesia and Malaysia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 872–880.
Shaari, N., Sulaiman, M. A., Alias, M. N., & Lestari, N. A. R. (2024). Review of issues and challenges in the auction process for immovable property in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 9(29), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v9i29.456
Silverman, D. (2020). Interpreting Qualitative Data (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Singh, A., & Chauhan, P. S. (2024). Digitalisation in the judiciary: Transforming justice for the 21st century. International Journal of Literacy and Education, 4(2), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.22271/27891607.2024.v4.i2c.226
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Normative Legal Research: A Brief Review. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sulaiman, M. A. (2022). Legal Methodology: Fundamentals of Doctrinal Research. Routledge.
Suryani, A. (2020). Legal Research Methods. Deepublish.
Susskind, R. (2020). Online courts and the future of justice. Oxford University Press.
Viola, R. (2017). Notaries as Class II Auctioneers. ADIL: Law Journal, 8(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v8i2.658
Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd edition). Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 LEGAL BRIEF

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

