Performance at the Directorate General of Politics and PUM, Ministry of Home Affairs
Keywords:
Bereaucratic Reform, Employee, PerformanceAbstract
The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the performance of employees at the Directorate General of Politics and General Administration of the Ministry of Home Affairs regarding bureaucratic reform in improving employee performance at the Directorate General of Politics and PUM of the Ministry of Home Affairs.'' This research was carried out by the Directorate General of Politics and PUM of the Ministry of Home Affairs. This type of research is qualitative research by analyzing events and facts in the field and matching existing theories with a case study approach. Data collection techniques used are observation, interviews and documentation.” The results of the research that has been done show that; (1) The performance of bureaucratic reform employees at the Directorate General of Politics and PUM of the Ministry of Home Affairs with the bureaucratic reform seen from three areas of change: Organizational Arrangement, Improvement of the Management System, and Management of Human Resources Management System as a whole has gone well. (2) The factor of cooperation between leaders and employees in creating good performance is the key to success in realizing bureaucratic reform''.
Downloads
References
Basrowi, & Suwandi. (2009). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Rineka Cipta.
Bogdan, Robert, C., & Taylors, K. . (1992). Qualitative Research for Education An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Ally and Bacon Inc.
Dwiyanto, A., Partini, Ratminto, & Wicaksono, B. (2006). Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. Gajah Mada University Press.
Dahlan, M. (1994). Kamus Ilmiah Populer. Arkola.
Ernawan, E. (1988). Peranan Birokrasi Terhadap Peningkatan Efektifitas Pengambilan Keputusan di Perusahaan Besar. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.
Ferlie, E., Et, & Al. (1996). The New Public Management In Action. Oxford University Press.
Miles, Huberman, & Saldana. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks?: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Fritz Morstein. (1957). The Administration State?: An Introduction to bureaucracy. The University of Chicago Press.
Blau, & Meyer. (1987). Bureaucracy in Modern Society. Mc Graw- Hill.
Sedarmayanti. (2009). Reformasi Administrasi Publik, Reformasi Birokrasi, dan Kepemimpinan Masa Depan. PT. Refika Aditama.
Widjaja. (2011). Otonomi Daerah dan Daerah Otonom. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rohman, Ahmad, & Dkk. (2010). Reformasi Pelayanan Publik. Averroes Press.
Prasojo, E., & Kurniawan, ?Teguh. (2008). Reformasi Birokrasi dan Good Governance: Kasus Best Practices dari Sejumlah Daerah di Indonesia. Makalah the 5th international Symposium of Antropologi Indonesia. 1–15.??
Jurnal
Fadilah, A. (2013). Pengaruh Penempatan Pegawai Terhadap Kinerja (Studi Pada Pegawai Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Gresik). Jurnal Administrasi Publik Mahasiswa Universitas Brawijaya, vol. 1.
Niranjan Banik, Adam Koesoemadinata, Charles Wagner, Charles Inyang, H. B. (2013). Pengaruh Motivasi Hygiene dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Pemuda dan Olahraga Kota Lubuklinggau. Vol. 18.
Hardani, L., Bachri, A. A., & Dahniar. (2016). Pengaruh Tunjangan Kinerja dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil Balai Karantina Pertanian Kelas I Banjarmasin. Jurnal Wawasan Manajemen, vol. 4.
Deikme, P. (2013). Motivasi Kerja Dan Budaya Organisasi Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Bagian Keuangan Sekda Kabupaten Mimika Provinsi Papua. Emba, vol. 1.
Pakpahan, Edi, S., & Siswidiyanto, S. (2017). Pengaruh Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai (Studi pada Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Kota Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), vol. 2.
Rumzi Samin. (2011). Reformasi Birokrasi. Jurnal FISIP Umrah, Vol. 2.
Komaruddin. (2011). Reformasi Birokrasi dan Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Sekretariat Negara RI, 148.
